UPGR vs. NFRA
UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while NFRA tracks the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPGR returned 2.07%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for NFRA. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for NFRA.
Performance
UPGR vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than NFRA's 9.49% return.
UPGR
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
NFRA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.37M | $2.66M | $4.22M | |
| $5.80K | $13.09K | $34.38K |
UPGR vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 2.89% | 35.25% | -14.72% | -15.29% |
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 9.49% | 18.42% | 4.76% | 3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGR and NFRA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between UPGR and NFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
UPGR vs. NFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPGR
NFRA
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
UPGR
NFRA
Basic Materials
UPGR
NFRA
-
Technology
UPGR
NFRA
Consumer Cyclical
UPGR
NFRA
Utilities
UPGR
NFRA
Consumer Defensive
UPGR
NFRA
Energy
UPGR
NFRA
Financial Services
UPGR
NFRA
Communication Services
UPGR
-
NFRA
Healthcare
UPGR
-
NFRA
Real Estate
UPGR
-
NFRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGR vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank
UPGR
NFRA
UPGR vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPGR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.97 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 5.87 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPGR vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than NFRA's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and NFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -32.49% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.71% | -7.28% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.58% | -9.16% | -33.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.86% | -1.65% | -16.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -4.50% | -15.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 2.44% | +6.14% |
Volatility
UPGR vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) at 1.93%. This indicates that UPGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.96% | 1.93% | +9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 8.45% | +15.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.99% | 10.40% | +22.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 12.96% | +18.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 14.87% | +16.22% |
UPGR vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGR vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison
UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than NFRA's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.65% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGR and NFRA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGR has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to NFRA (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs NFRA's -32.49%.
On 3-year performance, NFRA leads with 12.91% vs 2.07% for UPGR. On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NFRA has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for NFRA.
NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.31% for UPGR.
UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.47% for NFRA.
NFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPGR and NFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer