UPGR vs. LNGX
UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPGR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
UPGR vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 21.08% return.
UPGR
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
LNGX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $535.18K | $464.11K | $610.54K | |
| $5.80K | $13.09K | $34.38K |
UPGR vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 2.89% | -4.69% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 21.08% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGR and LNGX is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGR vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
UPGR
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPGR vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPGR | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPGR vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -17.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGR | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -17.89% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.86% | -10.91% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -6.45% | -13.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | — | — |
Volatility
UPGR vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGR | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.99% | 25.02% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 25.02% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 25.02% | +6.07% |
UPGR vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGR vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than LNGX's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.82% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGR and LNGX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
LNGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.31% for UPGR.
UPGR is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while LNGX is Energy Equities. UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for UPGR and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer