UPGR vs. LNGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.

Performance

UPGR vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than LNGX's 20.47% return.

UPGR

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 12.74%
• YTD: 22.11%
• 6M: 20.09%
• 1Y: 71.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LNGX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGR vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	22.11%	-6.05%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	20.47%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and LNGX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

UPGR vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 68
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGR vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UPGR	LNGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.65	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UPGR	LNGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	2.10	-1.89

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and LNGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGR	LNGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-14.31%	-32.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-11.36%	+8.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-4.37%	-16.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UPGR	LNGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.33%	24.67%	+5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.51%	24.67%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.51%	24.67%	+5.84%

UPGR vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPGR vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.27%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGR and LNGX in my portfolio?

UPGR and LNGX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UPGR or LNGX?

On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGR or LNGX?

UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGR or LNGX?

UPGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between UPGR and LNGX?

UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.45% for LNGX.