UPGR vs. XLE
UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UPGR returned 80.78% vs 44.84% for XLE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
UPGR vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 30.48% return.
UPGR
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 25.26%
- 6M
- 25.20%
- 1Y
- 80.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 30.48%
- 6M
- 30.54%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 20.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
UPGR vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 25.26% | 35.25% | -14.72% | -15.29% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 30.48% | 7.88% | 5.56% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGR and XLE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.25 |
The correlation between UPGR and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UPGR vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPGR
XLE
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
UPGR
XLE
-
Utilities
UPGR
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPGR
XLE
-
Basic Materials
UPGR
XLE
-
Energy
UPGR
XLE
Technology
UPGR
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
UPGR
XLE
-
Financial Services
UPGR
XLE
-
Communication Services
UPGR
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
UPGR
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
UPGR
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGR vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
UPGR
XLE
UPGR vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPGR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | 2.20 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 2.83 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.88 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 11.35 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPGR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.20 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
UPGR vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -71.26% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.55% | -12.05% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.35% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -17.98% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.72% | 4.12% | +2.60% |
Volatility
UPGR vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.19%. This indicates that UPGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | 8.19% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 16.56% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.23% | 20.53% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.49% | 26.01% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.49% | 29.59% | +0.90% |
UPGR vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGR vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than XLE's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.26% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.57% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGR and XLE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGR has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to XLE (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 1-year performance, UPGR leads with 80.78% vs 44.84% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UPGR has performed better with a 80.78% return vs 44.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.26% for UPGR.
UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.08% for XLE.
UPGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPGR and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer