UPGR vs. FTWO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FTWO tracks the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UPGR returned 51.55% vs 24.37% for FTWO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

UPGR vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 7.77% return.

UPGR

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: 11.51%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTWO

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGR vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	11.51%	35.25%	-14.72%	-6.80%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	7.77%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and FTWO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.59

The correlation between UPGR and FTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPGR vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPGR	FTWO
Industrials	49.3%	33.1%
Utilities	12.8%	11.2%
Basic Materials	10.7%	26.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Energy	10.0%	27.9%
Technology	3.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	1.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UPGR vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 54
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 37
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGR vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPGR	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.31	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.83	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	1.68	+1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	4.88	+2.38

UPGR vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGR and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGR	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-18.17%	-28.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.55%	-14.55%	-2.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.98%	-11.75%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-3.57%	-16.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	5.00%	+2.12%

Volatility

UPGR vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 6.27%. This indicates that UPGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPGR	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.17%	6.27%	+5.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	15.08%	+7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.65%	18.71%	+12.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.83%	19.31%	+11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.83%	19.31%	+11.52%

UPGR vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPGR vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FTWO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.04%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.29%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGR and FTWO in my portfolio?

UPGR and FTWO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPGR or FTWO?

UPGR has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to FTWO (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, UPGR or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, UPGR leads with 51.55% vs 24.37% for FTWO. On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPGR or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, UPGR has performed better with a 51.55% return vs 24.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGR or FTWO?

UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGR or FTWO?

FTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.29% for UPGR.

What is the main difference between UPGR and FTWO?

UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.