UPGD vs. QIDX

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

UPGD (Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. UPGD is passively managed, while QIDX is actively managed. Over the past year, UPGD returned 16.65% vs 12.95% for QIDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPGD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

UPGD vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 10.52% return.

UPGD

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 7.66%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 1Y: 16.65%
• 3Y*: 13.33%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

QIDX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 7.60%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 1Y: 12.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGD vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF	11.58%	8.89%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	10.52%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGD and QIDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.83

The correlation between UPGD and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UPGD vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGD

UPGD Risk / Return Rank: 39
UPGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
UPGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
UPGD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
UPGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UPGD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 40
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGD vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPGD	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.10	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.63	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.75	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	5.86	-0.51

UPGD vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGD and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPGD vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGD	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.74%	-14.99%	-45.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-6.92%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.09%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-2.18%	-8.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.07%	+0.86%

Volatility

UPGD vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 2.87%. This indicates that UPGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPGD	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	2.87%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	8.47%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	11.02%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.66%	14.37%	+4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.54%	14.37%	+7.17%

UPGD vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPGD vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than QIDX's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.86%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF	1.57%	1.75%	1.28%	1.39%	0.72%	0.52%	0.28%	0.20%	1.43%	0.00%	1.55%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGD and QIDX in my portfolio?

UPGD and QIDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPGD or QIDX?

UPGD has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to QIDX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

Which ETF is better, UPGD or QIDX?

On 1-year performance, UPGD leads with 16.65% vs 12.95% for QIDX. On fees, UPGD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPGD or QIDX?

Over the 1-year period, UPGD has performed better with a 16.65% return vs 12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGD or QIDX?

UPGD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGD or QIDX?

UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.86% for QIDX.

What is the main difference between UPGD and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.50% for QIDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.