PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNWPX vs. GOLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly higher than GOLDX's -0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed GOLDX with an annualized return of 5.78%, while GOLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.


UNWPX

1D
-4.05%
1M
1.43%
YTD
19.08%
6M
30.15%
1Y
97.38%
3Y*
36.43%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
5.78%

GOLDX

1D
-3.45%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
6.51%
1Y
64.12%
3Y*
44.39%
5Y*
20.24%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
19.08%136.32%2.07%-16.18%-32.95%-13.88%70.83%22.59%-31.49%-3.82%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
-0.92%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UNWPX and GOLDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.87

The correlation between UNWPX and GOLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNWPX vs. GOLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNWPX
UNWPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UNWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UNWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNWPXGOLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.04

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

5.39

+7.90

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNWPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the GOLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNWPX and GOLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNWPXGOLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.53

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.63

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.45

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.23

-0.16

Drawdowns

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than GOLDX's maximum drawdown of -73.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and GOLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNWPXGOLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-73.40%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.02%

-31.96%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.17%

-31.96%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.16%

-44.73%

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-49.42%

-19.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.89%

-27.39%

-5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-34.50%

-14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

12.02%

-4.30%

Volatility

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) is 13.75%, while Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) has a volatility of 14.72%. This indicates that UNWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNWPXGOLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

14.72%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.00%

35.65%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.78%

42.53%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.43%

32.56%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.43%

32.13%

-1.70%

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than GOLDX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNWPX vs. GOLDX - Dividend Comparison

UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.39%, more than GOLDX's 15.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.72%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
75.39%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.74%6.76%0.00%17.45%28.55%0.33%9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNWPX and GOLDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLDX has higher volatility (14.72%) compared to UNWPX (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNWPX dropped -83.78% vs GOLDX's -73.40%.

UNWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNWPX and GOLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer