PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 14.52%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
-3.08%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
1.07%
6M
8.57%
1Y
68.25%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
14.52%

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
1.07%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and TQQQ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

3.07

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

3.19

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

4.08

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.58

13.38

-6.80

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

3.07

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.45

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.69

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.74

-0.51

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-81.66%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.96%

-36.97%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.96%

-58.04%

+26.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-81.66%

+36.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-81.66%

+32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

0.00%

-25.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-18.53%

-15.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.79%

11.28%

+0.51%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.26%. This indicates that GOLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

13.26%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

36.05%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.68%

47.63%

-4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

66.55%

-34.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

65.98%

-33.72%

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.41%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLDX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLDX has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to TQQQ (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLDX and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer