PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 13.00%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.48% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
-1.33%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-9.29%
1Y
60.32%
3Y*
45.67%
5Y*
21.54%
10Y*
13.00%

TQQQ

1D
-9.86%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
41.43%
6M
35.75%
1Y
100.69%
3Y*
58.02%
5Y*
21.47%
10Y*
45.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
-4.65%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
41.43%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and TQQQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.21

The correlation between GOLDX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLDXTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.74

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

8.72

-4.19

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-81.66%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.54%

-36.97%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.54%

-58.04%

+20.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-81.66%

+36.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-81.66%

+32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.12%

-14.65%

-15.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-18.49%

-16.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.67%

11.59%

+2.08%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) is 16.92%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that GOLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.92%

27.27%

-10.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.14%

43.35%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.68%

53.39%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.08%

67.41%

-34.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

66.32%

-33.92%

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.33%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
16.33%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.42%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLDX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to GOLDX (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLDX and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer