UNWPX vs. FGADX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX).
UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010.
Performance
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -41.34% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a -41.34% return, which is significantly lower than FGADX's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed FGADX with an annualized return of 1.70%, while FGADX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.
UNWPX
- 1D
- -37.54%
- 1M
- -53.72%
- YTD
- -41.34%
- 6M
- -32.73%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- -6.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
FGADX
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 122.00%
- 3Y*
- 51.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNWPX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank
UNWPX
FGADX
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNWPX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 2.86 | -2.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 3.02 | -2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 3.95 | -3.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 14.72 | -12.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNWPX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 2.86 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.75 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.56 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.27 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and FGADX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than FGADX's 9.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 10.15% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 9.28% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than FGADX's maximum drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and FGADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNWPX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.78% | -78.57% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.72% | -31.15% | -22.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.16% | -48.77% | -15.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -49.27% | -19.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.94% | -21.41% | -45.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -34.81% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 8.36% | -0.44% |
Volatility
UNWPX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 47.77% compared to Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) at 18.27%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNWPX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.77% | 18.27% | +29.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.55% | 35.18% | +22.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.52% | 43.06% | +11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 33.13% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 32.83% | -0.54% |