FGADX vs. FGPMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX).
FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010. FGPMX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 1, 2013.
Performance
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | -10.83% |
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | 5.79% | 197.33% | 18.11% | 2.35% | -23.15% | -3.66% | 44.76% | 52.07% | -17.76% | -10.66% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGADX having a 5.78% return and FGPMX slightly higher at 5.79%.
FGADX
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 122.00%
- 3Y*
- 51.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
FGPMX
- 1D
- 8.12%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 122.08%
- 3Y*
- 51.57%
- 5Y*
- 24.88%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGADX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FGPMX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGADX vs. FGPMX — Risk / Return Rank
FGADX
FGPMX
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGADX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 2.86 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 3.02 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.95 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 14.73 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGADX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.57 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGADX and FGPMX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Dividend Comparison
FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than FGPMX's 9.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 9.28% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% |
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | 9.14% | 9.67% | 12.41% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 8.79% | 10.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGADX drawdown since its inception was -78.57%, which is greater than FGPMX's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGADX and FGPMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGADX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.57% | -48.71% | -29.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.15% | -31.14% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -48.71% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.41% | -21.41% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -17.89% | -16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 8.35% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FGADX vs. FGPMX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) have volatilities of 18.27% and 18.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGADX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.27% | 18.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.18% | 35.18% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.06% | 43.03% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 33.12% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 32.18% | +0.65% |