FGADX vs. FGPMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGADX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class) and FGPMX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6) are both Precious Metals funds from Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGADX returned 21.01%/yr vs 21.13%/yr for FGPMX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGADX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FGPMX.

Performance

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGADX having a 5.68% return and FGPMX slightly higher at 5.72%.

FGADX

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 85.55%
• 3Y*: 53.56%
• 5Y*: 21.01%
• 10Y*: 16.11%

FGPMX

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 18.06%
• 1Y: 85.65%
• 3Y*: 53.70%
• 5Y*: 21.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	5.68%	197.29%	17.98%	2.20%	-23.24%	-3.76%	44.60%	51.87%	-17.89%	-10.83%
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	5.72%	197.33%	18.11%	2.35%	-23.15%	-3.66%	44.76%	52.07%	-17.76%	-10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FGADX and FGPMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2017	1.00

The correlation between FGADX and FGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGADX vs. FGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGADX

FGADX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FGADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FGADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FGADX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FGADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FGADX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FGPMX

FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGADX	FGPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.22	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.51	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.09	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	8.77	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGADX and FGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGADX	FGPMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	2.22	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.63	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.56	-0.29

Drawdowns

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGADX drawdown since its inception was -78.57%, which is greater than FGPMX's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGADX and FGPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGADX	FGPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.57%	-48.71%	-29.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.15%	-31.14%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.15%	-31.14%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-48.71%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.48%	-21.46%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-17.88%	-16.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	10.97%	+0.01%

Volatility

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) have volatilities of 13.57% and 13.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGADX	FGPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.57%	13.55%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.26%	35.25%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.28%	42.27%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.68%	33.67%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.87%	32.40%	+0.47%

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGADX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FGPMX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGADX vs. FGPMX - Dividend Comparison

FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than FGPMX's 9.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	9.28%	9.81%	12.51%	3.09%	0.00%	8.83%	10.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	8.38%
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	9.15%	9.67%	12.41%	3.18%	0.00%	8.79%	10.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGADX and FGPMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FGADX and FGPMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGADX or FGPMX?

FGADX has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to FGPMX (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGADX dropped -78.57% vs FGPMX's -48.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.