UNOV vs. PJUL
UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - UNOV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UNOV returned 6.68%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for PJUL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
UNOV vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 4.74% return.
UNOV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 13.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.40% | 9.92% | 9.42% | 14.18% | -6.23% | 4.45% | 8.31% | 1.87% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNOV and PJUL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between UNOV and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
UNOV vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UNOV
PJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UNOV
PJUL
Financial Services
UNOV
PJUL
Communication Services
UNOV
PJUL
Consumer Cyclical
UNOV
PJUL
Healthcare
UNOV
PJUL
Industrials
UNOV
PJUL
Consumer Defensive
UNOV
PJUL
Energy
UNOV
PJUL
Utilities
UNOV
PJUL
Real Estate
UNOV
PJUL
Basic Materials
UNOV
PJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNOV vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
UNOV
PJUL
UNOV vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNOV | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.59 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.22 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 23.24 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNOV | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.73 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.90 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
UNOV vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNOV | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -18.17% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -3.64% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -10.69% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.10% | -10.69% | +1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -1.47% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.66% | +0.27% |
Volatility
UNOV vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 0.42%. This indicates that UNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNOV | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 0.42% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | 3.89% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.58% | 5.66% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 8.60% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 10.03% | -2.31% |
UNOV vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UNOV and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
UNOV vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNOV nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNOV and PJUL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNOV has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNOV dropped -13.84% vs PJUL's -18.17%.
On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 6.68% for UNOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UNOV and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
UNOV and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UNOV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PJUL is Defined Outcome. UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNOV and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer