PJUL vs. JQUA
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while JQUA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.48%/yr vs 14.20%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
PJUL vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.47% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 12.47% | -4.45% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.47% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and JQUA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PJUL and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJUL vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
JQUA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PJUL
JQUA
Financial Services
PJUL
JQUA
Communication Services
PJUL
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
JQUA
Healthcare
PJUL
JQUA
Industrials
PJUL
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
JQUA
Energy
PJUL
JQUA
Utilities
PJUL
JQUA
Real Estate
PJUL
JQUA
Basic Materials
PJUL
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
JQUA
PJUL vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 2.13 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.27 | 3.04 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.38 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.83 | 14.27 | +10.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.13 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.91 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -32.92% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -7.13% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -16.81% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -22.47% | +11.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -4.16% | +2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.69% | -1.03% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.45%, while JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 2.83% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 8.33% | -4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 11.21% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 15.61% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 17.99% | -7.96% |
PJUL vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUL vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
PJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and JQUA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to PJUL (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 14.20% vs 10.48% for PJUL. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUL.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for PJUL.
PJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JQUA is Large Cap Growth Equities. PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.12% for JQUA.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer