UNL vs. BEMB
UNL (United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP) and BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Natural Gas, while BEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. UNL is passively managed, while BEMB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UNL returned -17.95%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for BEMB. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. UNL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BEMB.
Performance
UNL vs. BEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNL achieves a -13.41% return, which is significantly lower than BEMB's 1.56% return.
UNL
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- -13.41%
- 6M
- -15.14%
- 1Y
- -30.69%
- 3Y*
- -17.95%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- -4.56%
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNL vs. BEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -13.41% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -31.03% |
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.56% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNL and BEMB is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | -0.08 |
The correlation between UNL and BEMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNL vs. BEMB — Risk / Return Rank
UNL
BEMB
UNL vs. BEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNL | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.39 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 2.43 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 10.44 | -11.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNL vs. BEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNL drawdown since its inception was -89.00%, which is greater than BEMB's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNL and BEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNL | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.00% | -6.17% | -82.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.43% | -3.67% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.16% | -6.17% | -41.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.68% | -0.45% | -88.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.39% | -0.93% | -72.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 0.85% | +19.60% |
Volatility
UNL vs. BEMB - Volatility Comparison
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) at 1.35%. This indicates that UNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNL | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 1.35% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.37% | 3.57% | +26.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.76% | 4.35% | +31.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.76% | 5.87% | +35.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 5.87% | +27.99% |
UNL vs. BEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMB's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNL vs. BEMB - Dividend Comparison
UNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.86% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNL and BEMB have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to BEMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNL dropped -89.00% vs BEMB's -6.17%.
On 3-year performance, BEMB leads with 8.46% vs -17.95% for UNL. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BEMB has performed better with a 8.46% return vs -17.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for UNL.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 0.00% for UNL.
UNL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BEMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for UNL and 0.18% for BEMB.
BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNL and BEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer