UNH vs. IESC
UNH (UnitedHealth Group Incorporated) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. UNH operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, UNH returned 13.32%/yr vs 48.97%/yr for IESC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UNH vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNH achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 92.75% return. Over the past 10 years, UNH has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 13.32%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.97% annualized return.
UNH
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- -4.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
IESC
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 92.75%
- 6M
- 62.95%
- 1Y
- 186.31%
- 3Y*
- 139.60%
- 5Y*
- 70.53%
- 10Y*
- 48.97%
UNH vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 24.71% | -33.14% | -2.41% | 0.80% | 6.94% | 45.20% | 21.25% | 20.00% | 14.52% | 39.83% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 92.75% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNH and IESC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998 | 0.13 |
The correlation between UNH and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UNH:
$371.75B
IESC:
$15.14B
UNH:
$13.23
IESC:
$18.85
UNH:
30.88
IESC:
39.78
UNH:
0.83
IESC:
4.17
UNH:
3.58
IESC:
14.11
UNH:
$449.71B
IESC:
$3.63B
UNH:
$84.55B
IESC:
$931.31M
UNH:
$22.99B
IESC:
$487.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNH vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
UNH
IESC
UNH vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 8.09 | -6.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 22.98 | -20.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNH vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNH drawdown since its inception was -74.37%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNH and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.37% | -98.32% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.96% | -21.80% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.39% | -49.23% | -12.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.39% | -54.22% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.39% | -54.28% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.27% | 0.00% | -32.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -54.97% | +40.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 7.66% | +5.53% |
Volatility
UNH vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is 7.60%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that UNH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNH | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.60% | 15.69% | -8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.86% | 50.65% | -19.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 62.74% | -22.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 54.09% | -22.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 48.19% | -18.01% |
Dividends
UNH vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 2.16% | 2.64% | 1.62% | 1.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.59% |
Financials
UNH vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UNH vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
UNH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 25.41B and revenue of 111.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
UNH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 8.99B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
UNH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a net income of 6.28B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNH and IESC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to UNH (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNH dropped -74.37% vs IESC's -98.32%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNH and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer