PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNH vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNH vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNH achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, UNH has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 13.15%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


UNH

1D
1.78%
1M
7.00%
YTD
24.12%
6M
26.61%
1Y
37.87%
3Y*
-4.40%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
13.15%

FEZ

1D
0.63%
1M
0.33%
YTD
4.68%
6M
6.49%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNH vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
24.12%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
4.68%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UNH and FEZ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002

0.35

The correlation between UNH and FEZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNH vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNH vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNHFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.12

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

3.81

-0.93

UNH vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNH Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNH and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.84

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.48

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.51

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.30

+0.34

Drawdowns

UNH vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNH drawdown since its inception was -74.37%, which is greater than FEZ's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNH and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.37%

-64.21%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.96%

-13.63%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.39%

-15.85%

-45.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.39%

-35.05%

-26.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.39%

-39.69%

-21.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.60%

-2.79%

-29.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-17.07%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

4.00%

+9.19%

Volatility

UNH vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.64%. This indicates that UNH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

5.64%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

15.06%

+15.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.17%

18.11%

+22.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

20.64%

+11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

21.12%

+9.07%

Dividends

UNH vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than FEZ's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.58%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.17%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNH and FEZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNH has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FEZ (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNH dropped -74.37% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

UNH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNH and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer