UNG vs. SPY
UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UNG returned -20.42%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for SPY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
UNG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -20.42%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -22.61%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -21.15%
- 5Y*
- -22.57%
- 10Y*
- -20.42%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
UNG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -1.14% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.33% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and SPY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.05 |
The correlation between UNG and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
SPY
UNG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.44 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 3.22 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 14.99 | -15.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.42 | -2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.82 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.37 | 0.87 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.59 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
UNG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -55.19% | -44.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.86% | -8.88% | -34.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.16% | -18.76% | -49.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.49% | -24.50% | -67.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.55% | -33.72% | -59.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -0.33% | -99.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.96% | -9.05% | -80.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.75% | 1.91% | +27.84% |
Volatility
UNG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.79%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 2.79% | +10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.06% | 8.91% | +44.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.59% | 11.82% | +48.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.11% | 17.05% | +47.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 17.93% | +36.85% |
UNG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNG and SPY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to SPY (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.48% vs -20.42% for UNG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.48% return vs -20.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for UNG.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for UNG.
UNG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SPY is S&P 500. UNG tracks Front Month Natural Gas, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for UNG and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer