PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -7.42% return, which is significantly lower than GBPUSD=X's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed GBPUSD=X with an annualized return of -21.38%, while GBPUSD=X has yielded a comparatively higher -0.52% annualized return.


UNG

1D
1.70%
1M
3.37%
YTD
-7.42%
6M
-10.84%
1Y
-29.37%
3Y*
-23.83%
5Y*
-24.47%
10Y*
-21.38%

GBPUSD=X

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.22%
1Y
-1.60%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
-0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-7.42%-27.07%-17.11%-64.04%12.89%35.76%-45.43%-31.77%5.96%-37.58%
GBPUSD=X
GBP/USD
-0.45%7.55%-1.67%5.28%-10.69%-0.91%3.06%4.01%-5.66%9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between UNG and GBPUSD=X is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.04

The correlation between UNG and GBPUSD=X shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNG
UNG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
UNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNG Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPUSD=X
GBPUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNGGBPUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.25

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

-0.47

-0.50

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNG and GBPUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than GBPUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -49.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and GBPUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNGGBPUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-49.29%

-50.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.86%

-5.26%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.16%

-9.34%

-58.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.49%

-24.23%

-68.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.55%

-27.99%

-65.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-36.44%

-63.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.96%

-31.18%

-58.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.28%

2.56%

+27.72%

Volatility

UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) at 1.22%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNGGBPUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

1.22%

+11.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.01%

4.96%

+47.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.61%

6.25%

+54.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.11%

8.24%

+55.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.77%

9.09%

+45.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNG and GBPUSD=X have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNG has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to GBPUSD=X (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs GBPUSD=X's -49.29%.

GBPUSD=X currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNG and GBPUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer