UNG vs. GBPUSD=X
UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas Futures, while GBPUSD=X (GBP/USD) is a currency. Over the past 10 years, UNG returned -22.45%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for GBPUSD=X. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than GBPUSD=X's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed GBPUSD=X with an annualized return of -22.45%, while GBPUSD=X has yielded a comparatively higher 0.24% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 1Y
- -35.08%
- 3Y*
- -29.27%
- 5Y*
- -28.40%
- 10Y*
- -22.45%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.43%
GBPUSD=X
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 0.12%
- 3Y*
- 1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 0.24%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.10%
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -16.07% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
GBPUSD=X GBP/USD | -0.18% | 7.55% | -1.67% | 5.28% | -10.69% | -0.91% | 3.06% | 4.01% | -5.66% | 9.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and GBPUSD=X is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
GBPUSD=X
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNG | GBPUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.01 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 0.02 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 0.04 | -1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than GBPUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -49.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and GBPUSD=X.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | GBPUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -49.29% | -50.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -4.89% | -35.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.16% | -9.34% | -58.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.49% | -23.41% | -69.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.55% | -25.46% | -68.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.87% | -36.26% | -63.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.01% | -31.40% | -58.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.99% | 2.59% | +23.40% |
Volatility
UNG vs. GBPUSD=X - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) at 1.58%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | GBPUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 1.58% | +8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.34% | 4.75% | +42.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.71% | 6.23% | +53.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.17% | 8.22% | +55.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.76% | 8.57% | +46.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNG and GBPUSD=X have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to GBPUSD=X (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs GBPUSD=X's -49.29%.
GBPUSD=X currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNG and GBPUSD=X
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer