UMI vs. BSMY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) and BSMY (Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc., while BSMY is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index. UMI is actively managed, while BSMY is passively managed. Over the past year, UMI returned 30.77% vs 7.65% for BSMY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UMI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMY.

Performance

UMI vs. BSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSMY's 1.76% return.

UMI

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 2.30%
• 6M: 27.68%
• YTD: 26.85%
• 1Y: 30.77%
• 3Y*: 27.34%
• 5Y*: 22.24%
• 10Y*: —

BSMY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.88%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 1Y: 7.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMI vs. BSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	26.85%	5.11%	14.71%
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF	1.76%	3.82%	-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UMI and BSMY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	-0.03

The correlation between UMI and BSMY shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UMI vs. BSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 81
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

BSMY

BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 74
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMI vs. BSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMI	BSMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.10	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.15	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	2.22	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	7.67	+2.71

UMI vs. BSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI and BSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMI vs. BSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than BSMY's maximum drawdown of -6.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and BSMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMI	BSMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.08%	-6.81%	-41.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.50%	-3.31%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-0.51%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-1.89%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	0.97%	+2.00%

Volatility

UMI vs. BSMY - Volatility Comparison

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) at 1.07%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMI	BSMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	1.07%	+4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	2.71%	+8.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	3.50%	+11.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	5.14%	+14.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.14%	5.14%	+18.00%

UMI vs. BSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMY's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMI vs. BSMY - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than BSMY's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF	3.49%	3.31%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.79%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMI and BSMY in my portfolio?

UMI and BSMY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMI or BSMY?

UMI has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to BSMY (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMI dropped -48.08% vs BSMY's -6.81%.

Which ETF is better, UMI or BSMY?

On 1-year performance, UMI leads with 30.77% vs 7.65% for BSMY. On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMI or BSMY?

Over the 1-year period, UMI has performed better with a 30.77% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMI or BSMY?

BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMI or BSMY?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 3.49% for BSMY.

What is the main difference between UMI and BSMY?

UMI is categorized as Energy Equities, while BSMY is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UMI and 0.18% for BSMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.