UMDD vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
UMDD and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMDD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 5.14% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 18.08% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.22% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.
UMDD
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -17.06%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
XDSQ
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMDD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.81 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.27 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.21 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 5.87 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMDD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.81 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.61 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and XDSQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -26.06% | -60.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.30% | -12.18% | -26.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.99% | -6.46% | -21.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -5.08% | -18.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | 2.50% | +8.16% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a higher volatility of 19.56% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that UMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.56% | 5.68% | +13.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.08% | 9.63% | +26.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.30% | 17.99% | +45.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 15.32% | +43.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.19% | 15.32% | +46.87% |