PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMDD vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMDD vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 38.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 13.11%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


UMDD

1D
-2.96%
1M
7.10%
YTD
38.16%
6M
30.23%
1Y
64.17%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
13.11%

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
38.16%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and SPYM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.80

The correlation between UMDD and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

UMDD vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UMDD
SPYM

Industrials

24.8%
8.0%

Technology

17.9%
38.0%

Financial Services

13.6%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.3%
1.8%

Energy

4.9%
3.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.6%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
10.1%

Industrials

UMDD
24.8%
SPYM
8.0%

Technology

UMDD
17.9%
SPYM
38.0%

Financial Services

UMDD
13.6%
SPYM
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UMDD
10.5%
SPYM
9.4%

Healthcare

UMDD
9.1%
SPYM
8.5%

Real Estate

UMDD
7.3%
SPYM
1.8%

Energy

UMDD
4.9%
SPYM
3.1%

Basic Materials

UMDD
4.8%
SPYM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

UMDD
3.3%
SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

UMDD
2.9%
SPYM
2.6%

Communication Services

UMDD
1.0%
SPYM
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMDD vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMDDSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.68

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

11.98

-3.70

UMDD vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMDDSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-54.46%

-31.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-8.90%

-17.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.33%

-18.72%

-41.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.61%

-24.48%

-40.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

-33.87%

-52.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-3.14%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-7.14%

-16.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

1.99%

+5.78%

Volatility

UMDD vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that UMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMDDSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.54%

4.83%

+8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.31%

9.83%

+25.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.51%

12.46%

+35.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.96%

16.90%

+42.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.23%

18.03%

+44.20%

UMDD vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMDD vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.76%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMDD and SPYM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMDD has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 13.11% for UMDD. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.76% for UMDD.

UMDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMDD and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer