UMDD vs. SPXL
UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while SPXL tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 10.70%/yr vs 28.12%/yr for SPXL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
UMDD vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 34.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPXL's 20.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 10.70%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 28.12% annualized return.
UMDD
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 34.48%
- 1Y
- 43.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.19%
SPXL
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 47.42%
- 3Y*
- 42.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 28.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.27%
UMDD vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 34.48% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.43% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and SPXL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between UMDD and SPXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UMDD vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UMDD
SPXL
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
UMDD
SPXL
Technology
UMDD
SPXL
Financial Services
UMDD
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
UMDD
SPXL
Healthcare
UMDD
SPXL
Real Estate
UMDD
SPXL
Basic Materials
UMDD
SPXL
Energy
UMDD
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
UMDD
SPXL
Utilities
UMDD
SPXL
Communication Services
UMDD
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
SPXL
UMDD vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMDD | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.78 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 6.99 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than SPXL's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -76.86% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -26.77% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.33% | -48.95% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -63.80% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | -76.86% | -9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -7.98% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -16.06% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 6.80% | +1.06% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) have volatilities of 10.26% and 10.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 10.42% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.21% | 30.23% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.26% | 37.86% | +9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 50.54% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.09% | 53.41% | +8.68% |
UMDD vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMDD vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than SPXL's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.69% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMDD and SPXL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to UMDD (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 28.12% vs 10.70% for UMDD. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.
UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.54% for SPXL.
UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMDD and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer