PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UMDD vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UMDD vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UMDD is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

UMDD vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 39.73% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

UMDD

1D
3.16%
1M
-0.95%
6M
22.93%
YTD
39.73%
1Y
60.12%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
19.42%

LINT

1D
1.75%
1M
-46.62%
6M
135.02%
YTD
266.23%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

LINT

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
$19.84M$20.02M$35.16M

UMDD

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
$270.14K$258.68K$250.88K

UMDD vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400		39.73%13.55%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		266.23%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and LINT is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.46

UMDD vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UMDD
LINT

Industrials

25.3%

-

Technology

17.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

13.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Industrials

UMDD
25.3%
LINT

-

Technology

UMDD
17.2%
LINT
100.0%

Financial Services

UMDD
13.9%
LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

UMDD
10.5%
LINT

-

Healthcare

UMDD
9.0%
LINT

-

Real Estate

UMDD
7.2%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

UMDD
4.8%
LINT

-

Energy

UMDD
4.6%
LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

UMDD
3.2%
LINT

-

Utilities

UMDD
2.9%
LINT

-

Communication Services

UMDD
1.5%
LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares

Often compared with UMDD:
UMDD vs. MIDUUMDD vs. SMDDUMDD vs. MVVUMDD vs. SAAUMDD vs. TQQQUMDD vs. MDYUMDD vs. URTY
Often compared with LINT:
LINT vs. INTWLINT vs. SOXLLINT vs. YINNLINT vs. ARMGLINT vs. XXXXLINT vs. SPYQLINT vs. MSTU

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMDD vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UMDDLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.28

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.91

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

—

—

UMDD vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and LINT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UMDDLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-69.02%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.33%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.61%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-62.23%

+57.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.43%

-24.07%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

—

—

Volatility

UMDD vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UMDDLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.11%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.07%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.12%

169.02%

-121.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.72%

169.02%

-110.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.12%

169.02%

-106.90%

UMDD vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		0.74%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400		0.67%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

UMDD and LINT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.67% for UMDD.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMDD and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer