PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMCVX vs. CAAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMCVX achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly higher than CAAPX's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, UMCVX has outperformed CAAPX with an annualized return of 14.19%, while CAAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.


UMCVX

1D
4.35%
1M
7.23%
YTD
24.24%
6M
24.38%
1Y
51.41%
3Y*
32.68%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
14.19%

CAAPX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.01%
YTD
9.88%
6M
12.22%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
24.24%21.17%30.42%15.70%-2.53%27.96%1.15%24.95%-12.56%9.97%
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
9.88%11.04%6.07%10.58%-12.27%25.72%7.42%24.58%-13.93%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between UMCVX and CAAPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.83

The correlation between UMCVX and CAAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMCVX vs. CAAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMCVX
UMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CAAPX
CAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMCVXCAAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.54

2.92

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.15

8.98

+11.17

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the CAAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMCVX and CAAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMCVXCAAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

1.89

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.22

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.39

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.51

-0.07

Drawdowns

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMCVX drawdown since its inception was -59.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CAAPX drawdown of -61.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMCVX and CAAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMCVXCAAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.30%

-61.92%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.70%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-27.29%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-33.40%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.77%

-42.58%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.98%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-8.06%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.79%

-1.13%

Volatility

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) at 4.13%. This indicates that UMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMCVXCAAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

4.13%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

12.73%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

18.10%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.26%

22.25%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

22.17%

+2.99%

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMCVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CAAPX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMCVX vs. CAAPX - Dividend Comparison

UMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than CAAPX's 11.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
11.71%12.86%6.11%6.31%10.51%14.21%9.85%7.58%7.37%12.53%7.88%12.05%
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
13.49%16.76%3.11%25.58%23.66%0.42%1.65%8.19%19.87%1.91%5.79%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMCVX and CAAPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMCVX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to CAAPX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMCVX dropped -59.30% vs CAAPX's -61.92%.

UMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMCVX and CAAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer