PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMCVX vs. NMAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMCVX achieves a 15.32% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 14.11% return. Over the past 10 years, UMCVX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.48% annualized return.


UMCVX

1D
2.45%
1M
-3.90%
6M
7.78%
YTD
15.32%
1Y
36.26%
3Y*
24.58%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
13.28%
ALL TIME*
9.46%

NMAVX

1D
-0.98%
1M
1.87%
6M
8.36%
YTD
14.11%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.48%
ALL TIME*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
15.32%21.17%30.42%15.70%-2.53%27.96%1.15%24.95%-12.56%9.97%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
14.11%1.91%5.20%6.44%-5.26%11.10%4.41%30.71%-5.44%14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UMCVX and NMAVX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between UMCVX and NMAVX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMCVX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UMCVX
UMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
UMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NMAVX
NMAVX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NMAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NMAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMCVXNMAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.74

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

4.36

+5.90

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the NMAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMCVX and NMAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMCVX drawdown since its inception was -59.30%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMCVX and NMAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMCVXNMAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.30%

-30.93%

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-9.80%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-18.40%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-18.40%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.77%

-30.93%

-14.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-1.25%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-3.78%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.89%

-0.64%

Volatility

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 4.17%. This indicates that UMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMCVXNMAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

4.17%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

9.15%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

11.87%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.45%

13.44%

+14.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.22%

14.97%

+10.25%

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMCVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMCVX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison

UMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, more than NMAVX's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
0.83%1.00%7.55%1.78%9.05%11.98%0.61%5.91%7.16%7.05%1.83%4.24%
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
14.53%16.76%3.11%25.58%23.66%0.42%1.65%8.19%19.87%1.91%5.79%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMCVX and NMAVX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMCVX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to NMAVX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMCVX dropped -59.30% vs NMAVX's -30.93%.

UMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMCVX and NMAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer