UMCVX vs. FASPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX).
UMCVX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jan 1, 1997. FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986.
Performance
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMCVX Invesco V.I. American Value Fund | 3.20% | 21.17% | 30.42% | 15.70% | -2.53% | 27.96% | 1.15% | 24.95% | -12.56% | 9.97% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 3.31% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UMCVX having a 3.20% return and FASPX slightly higher at 3.31%. Over the past 10 years, UMCVX has outperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.33% annualized return.
UMCVX
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 32.55%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
FASPX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMCVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMCVX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank
UMCVX
FASPX
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMCVX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.94 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.46 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.25 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 5.06 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMCVX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.94 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.31 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.40 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMCVX and FASPX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison
UMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%, more than FASPX's 9.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMCVX Invesco V.I. American Value Fund | 16.24% | 16.76% | 3.11% | 25.58% | 23.66% | 0.42% | 1.65% | 8.19% | 19.87% | 1.91% | 5.79% | 15.77% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 9.02% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMCVX drawdown since its inception was -59.30%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMCVX and FASPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMCVX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.30% | -70.11% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -15.26% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -34.53% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.77% | -48.02% | +2.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.69% | -9.84% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -9.87% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.76% | -0.12% |
Volatility
UMCVX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 5.25%. This indicates that UMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMCVX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 5.25% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 12.52% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.49% | 22.49% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.13% | 20.62% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 21.96% | +3.12% |