PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAPX vs. ARFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAPX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARFFX's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAPX has underperformed ARFFX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while ARFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


CAAPX

1D
1.05%
1M
4.46%
YTD
12.31%
6M
10.62%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
8.79%

ARFFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.39%
6M
7.53%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
12.31%11.04%6.07%10.58%-12.27%25.72%7.42%24.58%-13.93%15.24%
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
8.39%21.00%13.39%6.98%-9.12%21.14%6.90%25.62%-13.23%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CAAPX and ARFFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2005

0.93

The correlation between CAAPX and ARFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAPX vs. ARFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAPX
CAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ARFFX
ARFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ARFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAAPXARFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

4.22

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.75

10.64

-1.89

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the ARFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAPX and ARFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAPX drawdown since its inception was -61.92%, which is greater than ARFFX's maximum drawdown of -57.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAPX and ARFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAPXARFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.92%

-57.66%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-8.02%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-23.39%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-24.50%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.58%

-43.22%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-4.31%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-9.43%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.18%

+0.61%

Volatility

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Volatility Comparison

Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) at 4.18%. This indicates that CAAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAPXARFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.18%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

9.58%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

13.71%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

18.54%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

19.88%

+2.31%

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAPX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ARFFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAPX vs. ARFFX - Dividend Comparison

CAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, less than ARFFX's 11.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
11.70%12.68%2.27%3.33%8.30%3.30%2.41%1.03%7.61%5.76%1.04%13.91%
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
11.45%12.86%6.11%6.31%10.51%14.21%9.85%7.58%7.37%12.53%7.88%12.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAAPX and ARFFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAAPX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to ARFFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAPX dropped -61.92% vs ARFFX's -57.66%.

ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAPX and ARFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer