PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMCVX vs. FSOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMCVX achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSOAX's 20.50% return. Over the past 10 years, UMCVX has outperformed FSOAX with an annualized return of 13.71%, while FSOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


UMCVX

1D
0.61%
1M
2.71%
YTD
19.06%
6M
21.54%
1Y
47.02%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
13.71%

FSOAX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.06%
YTD
20.50%
6M
11.97%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
19.06%21.17%30.42%15.70%-2.53%27.96%1.15%24.95%-12.56%9.97%
FSOAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A
20.50%-2.17%-3.64%20.24%-7.61%32.95%7.95%34.16%-17.02%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UMCVX and FSOAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.85

The correlation between UMCVX and FSOAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMCVX vs. FSOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMCVX
UMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOAX
FSOAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FSOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMCVXFSOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

1.43

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

1.87

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.27

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

2.40

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.65

8.41

+9.24

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the FSOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMCVX and FSOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMCVXFSOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.43

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.27

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.43

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.40

+0.04

Drawdowns

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMCVX drawdown since its inception was -59.30%, smaller than the maximum FSOAX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMCVX and FSOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMCVXFSOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.30%

-70.02%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.56%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-35.33%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-35.33%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.77%

-47.99%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-4.27%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-9.99%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.30%

-0.64%

Volatility

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco V.I. American Value Fund (UMCVX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) at 4.29%. This indicates that UMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMCVXFSOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.29%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

15.82%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

19.71%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

21.26%

+5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.13%

22.29%

+2.84%

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMCVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FSOAX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMCVX vs. FSOAX - Dividend Comparison

UMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.07%, while FSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSOAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.90%2.43%8.70%0.82%5.59%17.03%7.64%22.64%1.10%
UMCVX
Invesco V.I. American Value Fund
14.07%16.76%3.11%25.58%23.66%0.42%1.65%8.19%19.87%1.91%5.79%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMCVX and FSOAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMCVX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FSOAX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMCVX dropped -59.30% vs FSOAX's -70.02%.

UMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMCVX and FSOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer