UMAY vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UMAY returned 6.16%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

UMAY vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAY achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

UMAY

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 8.99%
• 3Y*: 10.88%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAY vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May	3.07%	8.79%	14.32%	12.53%	-9.21%	5.25%	6.84%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAY and ENFR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020	0.41

The correlation between UMAY and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMAY vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMAY	ENFR
Technology	35.7%	-
Financial Services	11.6%	0.1%
Communication Services	11.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	98.5%
Utilities	2.4%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

UMAY vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAY

UMAY Risk / Return Rank: 88
UMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
UMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
UMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
UMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAY vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMAY	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.88	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.59	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.32	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.34	3.23	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.83	8.24	+18.59

UMAY vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAY and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMAY vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAY drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAY and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAY	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-68.28%	+56.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-8.64%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.49%	-15.58%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.12%	-20.29%	+8.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-4.71%	+3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-15.94%	+13.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	3.38%	-3.04%

Volatility

UMAY vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) is 2.00%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that UMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAY	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.00%	5.69%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.04%	11.60%	-8.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	14.86%	-10.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.50%	19.25%	-10.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.94%	24.68%	-16.74%

UMAY vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMAY vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

UMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
UMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAY and ENFR in my portfolio?

UMAY and ENFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMAY or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to UMAY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAY dropped -12.12% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, UMAY or ENFR?

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 20.07% vs 6.16% for UMAY. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMAY or ENFR?

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMAY or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMAY or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for UMAY.

What is the main difference between UMAY and ENFR?

UMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. UMAY tracks S&P 500, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UMAY and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.