UMAY vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UMAY is passively managed, while FBUF is actively managed. Over the past year, UMAY returned 8.99% vs 16.49% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

UMAY vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAY achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 3.62% return.

UMAY

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 8.99%
• 3Y*: 10.88%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAY vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May	3.07%	8.79%	10.94%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.62%	14.01%	10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAY and FBUF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	0.84

The correlation between UMAY and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UMAY vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAY

UMAY Risk / Return Rank: 88
UMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
UMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
UMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
UMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAY vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMAY	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.05	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.74	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.40	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.34	2.95	+2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.83	12.59	+14.24

UMAY vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAY and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMAY vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAY drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAY and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAY	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-11.09%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-5.61%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-1.83%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-1.38%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	1.31%	-0.97%

Volatility

UMAY vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) is 2.00%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that UMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAY	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.00%	3.44%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.04%	6.11%	-3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	8.11%	-4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.50%	9.69%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.94%	9.69%	-1.75%

UMAY vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMAY vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

UMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%
UMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAY and FBUF in my portfolio?

UMAY and FBUF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMAY or FBUF?

FBUF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to UMAY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAY dropped -12.12% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, UMAY or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 16.49% vs 8.99% for UMAY. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, UMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMAY or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMAY or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMAY or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for UMAY.

What is the main difference between UMAY and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UMAY and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.