ULVM vs. UEVM
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Victory Capital - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while UEVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.59%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for UEVM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
ULVM vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 11.06% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 11.06% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and UEVM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ULVM and UEVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ULVM vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
UEVM
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
UEVM
Technology
ULVM
UEVM
Utilities
ULVM
UEVM
Industrials
ULVM
UEVM
Healthcare
ULVM
UEVM
Real Estate
ULVM
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
UEVM
Basic Materials
ULVM
UEVM
Communication Services
ULVM
UEVM
Energy
ULVM
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
UEVM
ULVM vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 1.88 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 2.55 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 2.92 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | 9.91 | +9.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 1.88 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.51 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.34 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -45.44% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.79% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -18.88% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -26.98% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -11.68% | +5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.88% | -1.32% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 3.13%, while VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 4.80% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 11.97% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 15.05% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 15.89% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 18.38% | +0.48% |
ULVM vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than UEVM's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 2.99% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and UEVM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UEVM has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to ULVM (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.59% vs 8.13% for UEVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.57% for ULVM.
ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.45% for UEVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer