PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULVM vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULVM vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and UEVM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.61

The correlation between ULVM and UEVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ULVM vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ULVM
UEVM

Financial Services

22.5%
17.7%

Technology

13.1%
15.5%

Utilities

12.6%
4.1%

Industrials

12.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

10.1%
4.4%

Real Estate

8.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.0%

Energy

3.4%
5.2%

Financial Services

ULVM
22.5%
UEVM
17.7%

Technology

ULVM
13.1%
UEVM
15.5%

Utilities

ULVM
12.6%
UEVM
4.1%

Industrials

ULVM
12.2%
UEVM
8.7%

Healthcare

ULVM
10.1%
UEVM
4.4%

Real Estate

ULVM
8.7%
UEVM
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ULVM
5.3%
UEVM
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

ULVM
4.7%
UEVM
5.5%

Basic Materials

ULVM
4.1%
UEVM
4.6%

Communication Services

ULVM
3.5%
UEVM
2.0%

Energy

ULVM
3.4%
UEVM
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULVM vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULVMUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.30

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

2.56

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

8.65

+9.99

ULVM vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULVMUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.65

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.48

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.33

+0.25

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULVMUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-45.44%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.79%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-18.88%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

-26.98%

+7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.18%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-11.67%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.89%

-1.33%

Volatility

ULVM vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.96%, while VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULVMUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

5.15%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

12.13%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

15.18%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

15.90%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

18.39%

+0.47%

ULVM vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULVM vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULVM and UEVM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.

ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.45% for UEVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULVM and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer