ULVM vs. SPVM
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while SPVM tracks the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.59%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for SPVM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
ULVM vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 9.05% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
ULVM vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 9.05% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and SPVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ULVM and SPVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
ULVM vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
SPVM
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
SPVM
Technology
ULVM
SPVM
Utilities
ULVM
SPVM
Industrials
ULVM
SPVM
Healthcare
ULVM
SPVM
Real Estate
ULVM
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
SPVM
Basic Materials
ULVM
SPVM
Communication Services
ULVM
SPVM
Energy
ULVM
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
SPVM
ULVM vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 2.58 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 3.68 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.45 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 4.53 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | 17.27 | +2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.58 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.62 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -45.35% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.57% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -18.66% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -19.48% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -4.99% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.72% | -0.16% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 2.81%. This indicates that ULVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.81% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 7.49% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 11.61% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 16.77% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 19.58% | -0.72% |
ULVM vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than SPVM's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.90% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and SPVM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to SPVM (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.59% vs 10.29% for SPVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.57% for ULVM.
ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.39% for SPVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer