ULVM vs. PXI
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.43%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for PXI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
ULVM vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 31.40% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PXI
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 31.40%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 43.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
ULVM vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 31.40% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | 15.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and PXI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ULVM and PXI has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ULVM vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
PXI
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
PXI
-
Technology
ULVM
PXI
-
Utilities
ULVM
PXI
-
Industrials
ULVM
PXI
Healthcare
ULVM
PXI
-
Real Estate
ULVM
PXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
PXI
-
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
PXI
-
Basic Materials
ULVM
PXI
Communication Services
ULVM
PXI
-
Energy
ULVM
PXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
PXI
ULVM vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 2.05 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 2.63 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 4.04 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 12.41 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.05 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.49 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.16 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -85.08% | +44.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -10.83% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -30.74% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -33.47% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -4.27% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -29.44% | +23.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.52% | -1.96% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.96%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 7.76% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 16.34% | -8.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 21.43% | -10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 33.47% | -17.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 37.19% | -18.33% |
ULVM vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than PXI's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.29% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and PXI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 5-year performance, PXI leads with 16.42% vs 11.43% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PXI has performed better with a 16.42% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.29% for PXI.
ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.60% for PXI.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer