PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULVM vs. DVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULVM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.


ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*

DVOL

1D
0.41%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.02%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-14.65%
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
1.61%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%26.10%-9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and DVOL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.75

The correlation between ULVM and DVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULVM vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ULVM
DVOL

Financial Services

22.5%
18.8%

Technology

13.1%
4.7%

Utilities

12.6%
3.0%

Industrials

12.2%
16.6%

Healthcare

10.1%
3.7%

Real Estate

8.7%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
8.2%

Basic Materials

4.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.6%

Energy

3.4%
14.0%

Financial Services

ULVM
22.5%
DVOL
18.8%

Technology

ULVM
13.1%
DVOL
4.7%

Utilities

ULVM
12.6%
DVOL
3.0%

Industrials

ULVM
12.2%
DVOL
16.6%

Healthcare

ULVM
10.1%
DVOL
3.7%

Real Estate

ULVM
8.7%
DVOL
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ULVM
5.3%
DVOL
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

ULVM
4.7%
DVOL
8.2%

Basic Materials

ULVM
4.1%
DVOL
6.0%

Communication Services

ULVM
3.5%
DVOL
3.6%

Energy

ULVM
3.4%
DVOL
14.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULVM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULVMDVOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

0.07

+2.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

0.19

+3.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.02

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

0.08

+4.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.64

0.30

+18.34

ULVM vs. DVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the DVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and DVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULVMDVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

0.07

+2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.48

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than DVOL's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and DVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULVMDVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-38.26%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.82%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-11.66%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

-24.65%

+4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-4.85%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-7.17%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.87%

-1.31%

Volatility

ULVM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULVMDVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.91%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

9.35%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

11.79%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

14.40%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

17.72%

+1.14%

ULVM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULVM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than DVOL's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.68%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%0.00%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULVM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULVM has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs DVOL's -38.26%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.68% for DVOL.

ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.60% for DVOL.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULVM and DVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer