ULVM vs. DVOL
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while DVOL tracks the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.43%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for DVOL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
ULVM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -14.65% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and DVOL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ULVM and DVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ULVM vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
DVOL
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
DVOL
Technology
ULVM
DVOL
Utilities
ULVM
DVOL
Industrials
ULVM
DVOL
Healthcare
ULVM
DVOL
Real Estate
ULVM
DVOL
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
DVOL
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
DVOL
Basic Materials
ULVM
DVOL
Communication Services
ULVM
DVOL
Energy
ULVM
DVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
DVOL
ULVM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 0.07 | +2.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 0.19 | +3.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.02 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 0.08 | +4.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 0.30 | +18.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 0.07 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.50 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than DVOL's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -38.26% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.82% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -11.66% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -24.65% | +4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -4.85% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -7.17% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.87% | -1.31% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.91% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 9.35% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 11.79% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 14.40% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 17.72% | +1.14% |
ULVM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.68% for DVOL.
ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.60% for DVOL.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer