UL vs. SPY
UL (Unilever PLC) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, UL returned 5.06%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for SPY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.06%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.
UL
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -2.45%
- 1Y
- -4.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
UL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL Unilever PLC | -2.45% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.67% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and SPY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 1993 | 0.41 |
The correlation between UL and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
UL
SPY
UL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.31 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 2.44 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 10.63 | -10.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -55.19% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -8.88% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | -18.76% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -24.50% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | -33.72% | +3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -0.91% | -13.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -9.02% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.13% | 2.04% | +11.09% |
Volatility
UL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Unilever PLC (UL) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that UL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 3.58% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 10.02% | +7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.18% | 12.58% | +9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 17.17% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 17.93% | +3.59% |
Dividends
UL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.64% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and SPY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UL has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer