PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. NTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. NTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unilever PLC (UL) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly lower than NTR's 9.77% return.


UL

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.16%
6M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.56%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
5.17%
ALL TIME*
9.38%

NTR

1D
-0.92%
1M
7.01%
6M
2.07%
YTD
9.77%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UL
Unilever PLC
-3.56%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
9.77%43.33%-16.97%-20.19%0.23%60.78%5.60%5.57%-7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and NTR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.12

The correlation between UL and NTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$133.56B

NTR:

$32.00B

EPS

UL:

€5.38

NTR:

$4.94

PE Ratio

UL:

10.07

NTR:

13.49

PEG Ratio

UL:

1.97

NTR:

0.20

PS Ratio

UL:

1.09

NTR:

1.16

PB Ratio

UL:

7.67

NTR:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

€109.27B

NTR:

$27.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

€90.89B

NTR:

$8.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

€24.12B

NTR:

$6.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.10

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.55

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

1.43

-1.78

UL vs. NTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the NTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and NTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum NTR drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and NTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-57.80%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-27.56%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-32.82%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-57.80%

+32.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.44%

-31.70%

+16.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-26.26%

+15.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.20%

10.47%

+2.73%

Volatility

UL vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unilever PLC (UL) is 6.50%, while Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

8.49%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

24.62%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.22%

32.14%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

34.17%

-13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

33.93%

-12.41%

Dividends

UL vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than NTR's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.29%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.68%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. NTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.38B
5.96B
(UL) Total Revenue
(NTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UL values in EUR, NTR values in USD

UL vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Unilever PLC and Nutrien Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
27.2%
Portfolio components
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

NTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UL and NTR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTR has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to UL (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs NTR's -57.80%.

NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and NTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer