PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. NKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. NKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -28.37% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 5.33%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.48% annualized return.


UL

1D
1.03%
1M
4.77%
YTD
-8.35%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-13.60%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
5.33%

NKE

1D
-2.24%
1M
8.24%
YTD
-28.37%
6M
-32.37%
1Y
-23.74%
3Y*
-23.49%
5Y*
-18.04%
10Y*
-0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
The Unilever Group
-8.35%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-28.37%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and NKE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$129.35B

NKE:

$66.51B

EPS

UL:

€5.06

NKE:

$1.52

PE Ratio

UL:

10.06

NKE:

29.55

PS Ratio

UL:

1.09

NKE:

1.43

PB Ratio

UL:

7.20

NKE:

4.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

€109.27B

NKE:

$46.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

€90.89B

NKE:

$18.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

€24.12B

NKE:

$3.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULNKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.89

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.58

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-1.09

-0.14

UL vs. NKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the NKE Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and NKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum NKE drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and NKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULNKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-75.19%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-46.18%

+21.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-64.21%

+39.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.53%

-74.64%

+48.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

-74.64%

+44.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.64%

-72.55%

+52.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-20.93%

+10.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.20%

24.38%

-12.18%

Volatility

UL vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 6.11%, while NIKE, Inc. (NKE) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULNKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

10.43%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

29.43%

-12.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

38.48%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

35.91%

-15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

32.29%

-10.68%

Dividends

UL vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than NKE's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.63%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.87%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. NKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
18.38B
11.28B
(UL) Total Revenue
(NKE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UL values in EUR, NKE values in USD

UL vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and NIKE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2021202220232024202520260
40.2%
Portfolio components
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UL and NKE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NKE has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to UL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs NKE's -75.19%.

NKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and NKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer