UL vs. MFC
UL (The Unilever Group) and MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) are both stocks. UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, UL returned 4.43%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for MFC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UL vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than MFC's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has underperformed MFC with an annualized return of 4.43%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.
UL
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 6M
- -8.37%
- 1Y
- -18.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
MFC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 32.27%
- 5Y*
- 19.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.88%
UL vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL The Unilever Group | -12.75% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 9.27% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and MFC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1999 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
UL:
$123.13B
MFC:
$46.97B
UL:
$5.06
MFC:
$4.06
UL:
11.08
MFC:
9.59
UL:
2.17
MFC:
3.36
UL:
1.20
MFC:
0.78
UL:
7.93
MFC:
1.07
UL:
$109.27B
MFC:
$79.35B
UL:
$90.89B
MFC:
$26.46B
UL:
$24.12B
MFC:
$8.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
UL
MFC
UL vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UL | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.98 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 5.41 | -6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UL | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 1.19 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.34 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
UL vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum MFC drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and MFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -83.61% | +30.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -12.49% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | -16.75% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.53% | -26.99% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | -57.44% | +27.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.50% | -1.95% | -21.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -29.41% | +18.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.93% | 4.64% | +7.29% |
Volatility
UL vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 5.63%, while Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 7.84% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | 15.82% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 20.72% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 24.13% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 28.42% | -6.80% |
Dividends
UL vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than MFC's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.43% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
UL The Unilever Group | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
UL vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UL vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and MFC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFC has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to UL (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs MFC's -83.61%.
MFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UL and MFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer