UJB vs. QLD
UJB (ProShares Ultra High Yield) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - UJB is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UJB returned 6.36%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UJB vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UJB achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UJB has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 6.36%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.
UJB
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
UJB vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 0.81% | 12.22% | 9.41% | 17.70% | -23.27% | 6.96% | 5.19% | 26.68% | -6.08% | 11.77% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UJB and QLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, UJB and QLD have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
UJB vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UJB
QLD
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
UJB
QLD
Basic Materials
UJB
-
QLD
Communication Services
UJB
-
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
UJB
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
UJB
-
QLD
Financial Services
UJB
-
QLD
Healthcare
UJB
-
QLD
Industrials
UJB
-
QLD
Real Estate
UJB
-
QLD
Technology
UJB
-
QLD
Utilities
UJB
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UJB vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UJB
QLD
UJB vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UJB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 2.70 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 3.16 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.42 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 11.92 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UJB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.70 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.58 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.81 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.60 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
UJB vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UJB drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJB and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UJB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -83.13% | +42.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.01% | -25.13% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.47% | -42.29% | +32.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.14% | -63.68% | +33.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | -63.68% | +23.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.53% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -18.17% | +12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 7.20% | -6.03% |
Volatility
UJB vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) is 2.29%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that UJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UJB | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 8.90% | -6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 24.08% | -18.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29% | 31.85% | -24.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 44.74% | -30.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 44.56% | -26.28% |
UJB vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UJB and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UJB vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 3.35% | 2.61% | 3.02% | 3.92% | 0.05% | 0.63% | 2.88% | 3.95% | 3.22% | 2.67% | 2.35% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UJB and QLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to UJB (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJB dropped -40.14% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 6.36% for UJB. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UJB has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UJB and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
UJB is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. UJB tracks Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UJB and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer