UJB vs. NVDQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UJB (ProShares Ultra High Yield) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UJB is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. UJB is passively managed, while NVDQ is actively managed. Over the past year, UJB returned 6.23% vs -54.11% for NVDQ. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. UJB charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.

Performance

UJB vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UJB achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -32.44% return.

UJB

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

NVDQ

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: -33.47%
• YTD: -32.44%
• 1Y: -54.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UJB vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield	0.83%	12.22%	9.41%	17.59%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-32.44%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-28.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UJB and NVDQ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	-0.33

Return for Risk

UJB vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UJB

UJB Risk / Return Rank: 32
UJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
UJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
UJB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
UJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
UJB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UJB vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UJB	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	-0.77	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	-1.01	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.89	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	-0.85	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	-1.50	+6.77

UJB vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UJB Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UJB and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UJB vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UJB drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJB and NVDQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UJB	NVDQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-99.45%	+59.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.01%	-63.49%	+58.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-99.31%	+98.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-88.50%	+82.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	36.14%	-34.96%

Volatility

UJB vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) is 1.59%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a volatility of 21.64%. This indicates that UJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UJB	NVDQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.59%	21.64%	-20.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.91%	55.15%	-49.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.28%	71.03%	-63.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	95.00%	-80.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	95.00%	-77.31%

UJB vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UJB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

UJB vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than NVDQ's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.39%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield	3.20%	2.61%	3.02%	3.92%	0.05%	0.63%	2.88%	3.95%	3.22%	2.67%	2.35%	3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UJB and NVDQ in my portfolio?

UJB and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UJB or NVDQ?

NVDQ has higher volatility (21.64%) compared to UJB (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJB dropped -40.14% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

Which ETF is better, UJB or NVDQ?

On 1-year performance, UJB leads with 6.23% vs -54.11% for NVDQ. On fees, UJB is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UJB has been the lower-risk option at 1.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UJB or NVDQ?

Over the 1-year period, UJB has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -54.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UJB or NVDQ?

UJB is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UJB or NVDQ?

UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.39% for NVDQ.

What is the main difference between UJB and NVDQ?

UJB is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UJB and 1.05% for NVDQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UJB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.