PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. SLVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -5.37% return.


UIVM

1D
0.32%
1M
0.05%
YTD
15.12%
6M
17.12%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*

SLVP

1D
3.38%
1M
-18.46%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
81.81%
3Y*
48.97%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
15.12%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-17.41%2.36%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
-5.37%202.84%14.47%-2.31%-18.06%-23.53%56.45%37.71%-22.10%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and SLVP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.40

The correlation between UIVM and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UIVM vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
SLVP

Financial Services

30.1%

-

Industrials

21.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.2%

-

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.6%
100.0%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Technology

4.6%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Financial Services

UIVM
30.1%
SLVP

-

Industrials

UIVM
21.8%
SLVP

-

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
8.2%
SLVP

-

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
6.2%
SLVP

-

Healthcare

UIVM
5.8%
SLVP

-

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.6%
SLVP
100.0%

Utilities

UIVM
5.2%
SLVP

-

Real Estate

UIVM
4.8%
SLVP

-

Technology

UIVM
4.6%
SLVP

-

Energy

UIVM
4.6%
SLVP

-

Communication Services

UIVM
3.2%
SLVP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIVMSLVPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.21

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

5.86

+4.85

UIVM vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and SLVP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMSLVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-80.47%

+37.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-38.06%

+27.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-38.06%

+26.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-53.17%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-31.74%

+31.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-46.78%

+37.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

14.31%

-11.28%

Volatility

UIVM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 6.01%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMSLVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

19.61%

-13.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

45.17%

-31.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

54.53%

-39.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

43.15%

-27.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

42.45%

-25.20%

UIVM vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than SLVP's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
1.88%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.02%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIVM and SLVP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to UIVM (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs SLVP's -80.47%.

On 5-year performance, SLVP leads with 14.15% vs 11.89% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.

UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while SLVP is Silver. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.39% for SLVP.

UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and SLVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer