PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 10.34% return.


UIVM

1D
0.60%
1M
4.11%
YTD
15.98%
6M
19.97%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*

MMTM

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.72%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
15.98%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-17.41%2.56%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
10.34%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and MMTM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.69

The correlation between UIVM and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UIVM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
MMTM

Financial Services

30.3%
16.0%

Industrials

21.4%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
6.7%

Healthcare

5.7%
10.8%

Technology

5.7%
29.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
2.0%

Utilities

4.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

4.7%
3.1%

Energy

4.3%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
7.7%

Financial Services

UIVM
30.3%
MMTM
16.0%

Industrials

UIVM
21.4%
MMTM
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
8.3%
MMTM
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
6.1%
MMTM
6.7%

Healthcare

UIVM
5.7%
MMTM
10.8%

Technology

UIVM
5.7%
MMTM
29.5%

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.6%
MMTM
2.0%

Utilities

UIVM
4.9%
MMTM
2.6%

Real Estate

UIVM
4.7%
MMTM
3.1%

Energy

UIVM
4.3%
MMTM
1.7%

Communication Services

UIVM
3.1%
MMTM
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIVMMMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.87

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.59

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.72

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.12

12.36

-0.24

UIVM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIVMMMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.87

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-33.85%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-9.89%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-22.08%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-23.72%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-4.20%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.18%

+0.82%

Volatility

UIVM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.10%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

2.10%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

10.69%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

14.14%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

18.20%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

18.65%

-1.44%

UIVM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.19%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIVM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UIVM has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to MMTM (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 5-year performance, MMTM leads with 13.95% vs 12.24% for UIVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.12% for MMTM.

UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer