PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UITB vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UITB vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.


UITB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.03%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UITB vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
0.17%7.32%1.81%6.49%-12.23%-0.88%7.99%11.40%-1.31%0.99%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UITB and USVM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.08

Over the past year, UITB and USVM have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UITB vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UITB
UITB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
UITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UITB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UITB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UITB vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UITBUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.66

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

13.76

-8.20

UITB vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UITB Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UITB and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UITBUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.05

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.50

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.49

-0.02

Drawdowns

UITB vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UITBUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.02%

-42.38%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-8.36%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-24.34%

+18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.02%

-25.27%

+8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.57%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-7.90%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.22%

-1.31%

Volatility

UITB vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is 1.24%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that UITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UITBUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

4.50%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

10.73%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

14.93%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

19.65%

-14.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

22.01%

-17.03%

UITB vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UITB vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

UITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
4.17%4.04%3.89%3.14%2.32%1.95%2.79%3.01%2.99%0.50%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


UITB and USVM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to UITB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UITB dropped -17.02% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 0.56% for UITB. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UITB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for UITB.

UITB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 1.76% for USVM.

UITB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USVM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for UITB and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UITB and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer