UITB vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

UITB is an actively managed fund by Victory Capital. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017.

Performance

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.02%	7.32%	1.81%	6.49%	-12.23%	-0.88%	7.99%	11.40%	-1.31%	0.99%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-3.95%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	4.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.

UITB

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.05%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: —

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UITB vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UITB

UITB Risk / Return Rank: 50
UITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
UITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
UITB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
UITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
UITB Martin Ratio Rank: 46

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UITB	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.92	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.41	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.21	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	1.41	+0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.79	6.61	-1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UITB and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UITB	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.92	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.61	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.46	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between UITB and ^GSPC is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UITB	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.02%	-56.78%	+39.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.56%	-12.14%	+9.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.02%	-25.43%	+8.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-5.78%	+3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-10.75%	+6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	2.60%	-1.70%

Volatility

UITB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is 1.55%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that UITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UITB	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	5.37%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	9.55%	-7.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11%	18.33%	-14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	16.90%	-11.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	18.05%	-13.05%