UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE
UIMT.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - UIMT.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMT.DE returned 4.70%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIMT.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMT.DE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.
UIMT.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMT.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 8.82% | 4.68% | 8.78% | 9.66% | -14.26% | 9.63% | 4.81% | 26.13% | -5.36% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMT.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UIMT.DE and LCUA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMT.DE
LCUA.DE
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMT.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 4.49 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 16.33 | -11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMT.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.72 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum LCUA.DE drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMT.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMT.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -33.18% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -12.13% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -21.07% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -28.54% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.86% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -12.02% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.34% | -0.50% |
Volatility
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) is 3.47%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that UIMT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMT.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 8.54% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 17.04% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 20.08% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 18.48% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 19.46% | -3.80% |
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMT.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIMT.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMT.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.42% | 1.76% | 1.51% | 1.60% | 1.89% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.92% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 2.36% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMT.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UIMT.DE.
UIMT.DE tracks MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UIMT.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMT.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer