LCUA.DE vs. SPMO
LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUA.DE returned 8.90%/yr vs 25.07%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCUA.DE is traded in EUR, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 29.91% return.
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 27.84%
- 1Y
- 41.51%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 25.07%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 11.56% | 55.44% | 14.03% | -4.90% | 31.82% | 17.68% | 28.77% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPMO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.36 |
The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (5 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
LCUA.DE
SPMO
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUA.DE | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 3.59 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 11.70 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUA.DE | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.35 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.29 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.96 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUA.DE | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -32.02% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -11.63% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -25.02% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -25.02% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -1.59% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -4.51% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.56% | -0.22% |
Volatility
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 6.79%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUA.DE | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 6.79% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 13.70% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 17.73% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 19.48% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 20.88% | -1.42% |
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUA.DE and SPMO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
LCUA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for LCUA.DE and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer