PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LCUA.DE vs. SPMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LCUA.DESPMO
YTD Return17.78%47.91%
1Y Return20.02%57.54%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.44%15.44%
5Y Return (Ann)5.10%20.47%
Sharpe Ratio1.323.40
Sortino Ratio1.914.38
Omega Ratio1.251.61
Calmar Ratio0.724.57
Martin Ratio6.6219.03
Ulcer Index3.06%3.16%
Daily Std Dev15.44%17.69%
Max Drawdown-33.18%-30.95%
Current Drawdown-10.55%-0.33%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPMO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 47.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.99%
18.92%
LCUA.DE
SPMO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SPMO
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
Expense ratio chart for SPMO: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%
Expense ratio chart for LCUA.DE: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCUA.DE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCUA.DE, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCUA.DE, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LCUA.DE, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCUA.DE, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LCUA.DE, currently valued at 4.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.89
SPMO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 4.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 17.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.87

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and SPMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.95
3.21
LCUA.DE
SPMO

Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCUA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
0.44%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and SPMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.08%
-0.33%
LCUA.DE
SPMO

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 4.64%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.40%
4.64%
LCUA.DE
SPMO