PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMT.DE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than APXJ.DE's 2.49% return.


UIMT.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.85%
YTD
8.82%
6M
9.17%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
6.16%

APXJ.DE

1D
-0.54%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.75%
1Y
1.04%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UIMT.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
8.82%4.68%8.78%9.66%-12.43%
APXJ.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.49%0.37%5.75%1.28%-6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2022

0.68

The correlation between UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMT.DE
UIMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UIMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

APXJ.DE
APXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMT.DEAPXJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.02

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.17

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

0.39

+4.23

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMT.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.09

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.05

+0.41

Drawdowns

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than APXJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMT.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-22.00%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-6.14%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-18.38%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-5.39%

+4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-9.38%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.63%

+0.21%

Volatility

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMT.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.55%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

9.30%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

11.99%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

14.33%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

14.33%

+1.33%

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMT.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than APXJ.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIMT.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than APXJ.DE's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APXJ.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.80%2.87%3.01%3.43%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMT.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.42%1.76%1.51%1.60%1.89%1.17%1.52%1.92%2.83%2.53%2.36%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMT.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMT.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for APXJ.DE.

UIMT.DE tracks MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while APXJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UIMT.DE and 0.45% for APXJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMT.DE and APXJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer