PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UIMT.DE having a 8.82% return and LGQK.DE slightly higher at 9.03%. Over the past 10 years, UIMT.DE has underperformed LGQK.DE with an annualized return of 6.16%, while LGQK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.


UIMT.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.85%
YTD
8.82%
6M
9.17%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
6.16%

LGQK.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
9.03%
6M
10.06%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIMT.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
8.82%4.68%8.78%9.66%-14.26%9.63%4.81%26.13%-9.67%7.30%
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
9.03%6.49%12.16%1.67%-1.07%12.33%56.18%16.88%-9.04%10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2011

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMT.DE
UIMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UIMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

LGQK.DE
LGQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMT.DELGQK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.21

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

6.30

-1.68

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMT.DELGQK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.14

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.55

-0.10

Drawdowns

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum LGQK.DE drawdown of -36.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMT.DELGQK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-36.96%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-6.26%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-20.04%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-20.04%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

-36.96%

+8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.16%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-6.18%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.20%

+0.64%

Volatility

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that UIMT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMT.DELGQK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.20%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

9.32%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

12.16%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

14.67%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

25.08%

-9.42%

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMT.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than LGQK.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIMT.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than LGQK.DE's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
2.64%2.88%5.33%3.78%4.41%3.15%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMT.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.42%1.76%1.51%1.60%1.89%1.17%1.52%1.92%2.83%2.53%2.36%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UIMT.DE.

UIMT.DE tracks MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UIMT.DE and 0.12% for LGQK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMT.DE and LGQK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer