LCUA.DE vs. SPYG

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG).

LCUA.DE and SPYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCUA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. SPYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both LCUA.DE and SPYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	3.60%	18.08%	18.51%	3.26%	-14.89%	1.98%	15.44%	22.39%	-10.90%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	-5.17%	7.60%	44.97%	26.13%	-25.04%	41.89%	22.46%	33.80%	7.25%

Different Trading Currencies

LCUA.DE is traded in EUR, while SPYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's -5.47% return.

LCUA.DE

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

SPYG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.93%
• YTD: -5.47%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: 19.72%
• 5Y*: 12.93%
• 10Y*: 15.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

LCUA.DE

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc

SPYG

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE

LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 55
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCUA.DE	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.59	+0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	0.98	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.14	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.05	+1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	3.50	+5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and SPYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUA.DE	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.59	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.62	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.63	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPYG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.57%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -45.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUA.DE	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.18%	-67.63%	+34.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-13.76%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.54%	-32.67%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.49%	-9.00%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-24.48%	+12.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.59%	-0.36%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.27%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUA.DE	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	6.27%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	13.04%	+1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.15%	24.53%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	20.87%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	21.01%	-1.82%