LCUA.DE vs. SPYG
LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUA.DE returned 8.90%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for SPYG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCUA.DE is traded in EUR, while SPYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 15.02% return.
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 15.02%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 15.02% | 7.60% | 44.97% | 26.13% | -25.04% | 41.89% | 22.46% | 33.80% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPYG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between LCUA.DE and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (5 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
LCUA.DE
SPYG
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUA.DE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 2.48 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 8.73 | +7.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUA.DE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 1.95 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.82 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUA.DE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -45.25% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -12.70% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -27.05% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -27.05% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -0.98% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -7.58% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.61% | -0.27% |
Volatility
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 3.74%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUA.DE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 3.74% | +4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 11.74% | +5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 16.20% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 20.91% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 21.03% | -1.57% |
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCUA.DE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUA.DE and SPYG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
LCUA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for LCUA.DE and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer