PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UI vs. LQDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UI vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UI achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 85.27% return.


UI

1D
0.96%
1M
-31.90%
YTD
3.76%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
40.95%
3Y*
51.97%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
31.52%

LQDA

1D
3.31%
1M
51.06%
YTD
85.27%
6M
82.52%
1Y
252.26%
3Y*
96.59%
5Y*
87.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UI vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
3.76%67.72%141.15%-48.23%-9.99%10.83%48.49%91.65%15.67%
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
85.27%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%95.14%

Correlation

The correlation between UI and LQDA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UI:

$34.69B

LQDA:

$6.46B

EPS

UI:

$15.56

LQDA:

$0.24

PE Ratio

UI:

36.82

LQDA:

267.21

PS Ratio

UI:

11.20

LQDA:

20.69

PB Ratio

UI:

28.86

LQDA:

59.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

UI:

$3.10B

LQDA:

$288.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UI:

$1.42B

LQDA:

$275.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

UI:

$1.12B

LQDA:

$51.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UI vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UI
UI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UI vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UILQDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

7.12

-6.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

15.88

-13.76

UI vs. LQDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UI Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the LQDA Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UI and LQDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UILQDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

3.74

-3.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.20

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.29

+0.24

Drawdowns

UI vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UI drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, smaller than the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UI and LQDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UILQDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.49%

-93.87%

+16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.62%

-35.66%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.62%

-46.80%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.44%

-55.36%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.12%

0.00%

-47.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.53%

-69.65%

+43.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.31%

16.05%

+3.26%

Volatility

UI vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) is 18.36%, while Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a volatility of 28.47%. This indicates that UI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UILQDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.36%

28.47%

-10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.92%

47.97%

-8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.06%

68.06%

-6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.63%

73.62%

-24.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.98%

85.75%

-37.77%

Dividends

UI vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison

UI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
0.56%0.51%0.72%1.72%0.88%0.65%0.50%0.58%0.50%

Financials

UI vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ubiquiti Inc. and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
788.20M
132.87M
(UI) Total Revenue
(LQDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UI vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ubiquiti Inc. and Liquidia Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
47.0%
99.4%
Portfolio components
UI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.71M and revenue of 788.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

LQDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

UI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported an operating income of 290.82M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

LQDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

UI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a net income of 233.91M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.

LQDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UI and LQDA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQDA has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to UI (18.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UI dropped -77.49% vs LQDA's -93.87%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UI and LQDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer