UI vs. ANET

In the year-to-date period, UI achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's -3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, UI has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 28.40%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 38.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UI Sharpe Ratio is 4.02, which is higher than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UI and ANET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum UI drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UI and ANET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) is 17.21%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 29.72%. This indicates that UI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ubiquiti Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.