PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UI vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UI vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UI achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 33.08% return. Over the past 10 years, UI has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 31.51%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 43.55% annualized return.


UI

1D
-2.11%
1M
-42.55%
YTD
4.37%
6M
2.45%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
51.93%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
31.51%

ANET

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.01%
YTD
33.08%
6M
36.44%
1Y
84.52%
3Y*
62.51%
5Y*
51.43%
10Y*
43.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UI vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
4.37%67.72%141.15%-48.23%-9.99%10.83%48.49%91.65%40.69%22.87%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
33.08%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between UI and ANET is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UI:

$34.90B

ANET:

$222.11B

EPS

UI:

$15.56

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

UI:

37.03

ANET:

59.73

PEG Ratio

UI:

2.40

ANET:

1.40

PS Ratio

UI:

11.27

ANET:

22.88

PB Ratio

UI:

29.03

ANET:

16.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

UI:

$3.10B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UI:

$1.42B

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

UI:

$1.12B

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UI vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UI
UI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UI vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIANETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

1.61

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

2.17

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

3.00

-2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.35

6.29

-3.94

UI vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UI Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UI and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIANETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.61

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.10

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.97

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.86

-0.32

Drawdowns

UI vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UI drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UI and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.49%

-52.20%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.87%

-28.33%

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.87%

-50.42%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.44%

-50.42%

-19.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.21%

-52.20%

-20.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.81%

-1.89%

-44.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.52%

-15.41%

-11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.61%

13.47%

+5.14%

Volatility

UI vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) have volatilities of 20.18% and 21.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.18%

21.10%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.85%

39.36%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.91%

52.87%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.67%

47.04%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.98%

44.89%

+3.09%

Dividends

UI vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

UI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
0.56%0.51%0.72%1.72%0.88%0.65%0.50%0.58%0.50%

Financials

UI vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ubiquiti Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
788.20M
2.71B
(UI) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UI vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ubiquiti Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
47.0%
61.9%
Portfolio components
UI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.71M and revenue of 788.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

UI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported an operating income of 290.82M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

UI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a net income of 233.91M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UI and ANET have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (21.10%) compared to UI (20.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UI dropped -77.49% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UI and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer