UHS vs. SCHD
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.37%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 1.37%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -15.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
UHS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UHS and SCHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
SCHD
UHS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.43 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 5.70 | -6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 13.97 | -14.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -33.37% | -26.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -4.61% | -36.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.52% | -16.13% | -25.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -16.85% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -33.37% | -22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.85% | -0.03% | -39.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -3.31% | -11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 1.89% | +15.44% |
Volatility
UHS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that UHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 3.05% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 7.53% | +17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 10.93% | +20.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 14.38% | +17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.37% | 16.72% | +17.65% |
Dividends
UHS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHS has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer